The study that is present the identified impact of parental and social stress on individuals’ perceptions regarding cross-cultural and interfaith relationship and marriage. The concerns of great interest had been: (1) what’s the impact of parental attitudes towards interfaith and cross-cultural relationships? (2) Just how can the individuals feel it impacts upon them? And finally, (3) Just how can the individuals predict they shall react to their children’s range of such relationships? Fifty-five college pupils with diverse backgrounds took part in this research. The findings suggest that most the individuals had been affected by the social stress placed upon them. Furthermore, the individuals sensed the previous generation as “racist”. But, interestingly you will find signs and symptoms of a generational attitude shift. Finally, the findings reveal that more than 80 percent associated with individuals didn’t would you like to interfere inside their children’s partner selection. The rest of the 20 per cent had been against interfaith and cross-cultural dating and marriages.
This will be a preview of membership content, access via your organization.
Purchase solitary article
Access immediately to your article PDF that is full.
Tax calculation shall be finalised during checkout.
Donate to journal
Immediate on the web access to any or all dilemmas from 2019. Subscription will auto renew yearly.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
It ought to be noted that relationship is generally speaking maybe maybe maybe not appropriate within the Arab and community that is muslim others) unless the couple’s intention is always to date solely (but, particular limitations may nevertheless use, e.g., limiting intimate tasks) along with the seek to get hitched. Furthermore, in some instances, the approval regarding the female’s dad ( or any other significant male figure) is needed seriously to enable this relationship to transpire. This matter ended up being addressed through the number of the info so that you can respect individuals’ social traditions and observing that is religious.
Berger, C. R. (1979). Beyond initial relationship: Uncertainty, understanding, therefore the growth of social relationships. In H. Giles & R. St. Clair (Eds.), Language and psychology that is socialpp. 122–144). Oxford: Blackwell.
Berger, C. R. (2005). Interpersonal interaction: Theoretical perspectives, future leads. Journal of correspondence, 55(3), 415–447.
Binder, J., Zagefka, H., Brown, R., Funke, F., Kessler, T., Mummendey, A., et al. (2009). Does contact reduce prejudice or does prejudice reduce contact? a test that is longitudinal of contact theory among bulk and minority teams in three europe. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(4), 843.
Boker, A. (2008). Kiryat Gat: Racist campaign against Bedouin guys dating women that are jewish. nana10. Retrieved 31, 2013, from http://news.nana10.co.il/Article/?ArticleID=563227 december.
Bost, S. (2010). Mulattas and mestizas: Representing identities that are mixed the Americas, 1850–2000. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.
Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Changing qualitative information: Thematic analysis and rule development. Ny, NY: Sage.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in therapy. Qualitative analysis in Psychology, 3, 77–101.
Cila, J., & Lalonde, R. N. (2013). Private openness toward interfaith dating and wedding among Muslim teenagers: The part of religiosity, social identification, and family members connectedness. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations. doi:10.1177/1368430213502561.
Cohen, A. B. (2009). Numerous kinds of tradition. American Psychologist, 64, 194–204.
Dion, K. K., & Dion, K. L. (1993). Individualistic and collectivistic views on sex in addition to social context of love and intimacy. Journal of Social problems, 49, 53–59.
Driscoll, hitwe mobile site R., Davis, K. E., & Lipetz, M. E. (1972). Parental disturbance and romantic love: the Romeo and Juliet effect. Journal of Personality and Social Structure, 24, 1–10.
Eggert, L. L., & Parks, M. R. (1987). Correspondence community participation in adolescents’ friendships and intimate relationships. Communication Yearbook, 10, 283–322.
Espiritu, Y. L. (2001). “We don’t rest around like White girls do”: Family, culture, and sex in Filipina American life. Indication, 26, 415–440.
Etcheverry, P. E., Le, B., & Hoffman, N. G. (2012). Predictors of buddy approval for intimate relationships. Personal Relationships, 4, 1–15.
Felmlee, D. (2003). Conversation in internet sites. In J. Delamater (Ed.), Handbook of social therapy (pp. 389–409). Ny: Plenum.
Felmlee, D., & Sprecher, S. (2000). Intimate lovers’ perceptions of social networking features because of the passage through of relationship and time transitions. Personal Relationships, 7, 325–340.
Goetz, J., & LeCompte, M. (1984). Ethnography and design that is qualitative academic research. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Harris, T. M., & Kalbfleisch, P. J. (2000). Interracial dating: The implications of competition for initiating a relationship that is romantic. Howard Journal of Communications, 11, 49–64.
Hollingshead, A. B. (1950). Social factors within the selection of wedding mates. United States Sociological Review, 15, 619–627.
Kalmijn, M. (1998). Homogamy and intermarriage: Reasons, patterns, trends. Yearly Report About Sociology, 395–421.
Lasson, K. (2008). Bloodstains for a Code of Honor: The Murderous Marginalization of females in the Islamic World. Women’s Rights Law Reporter, 30, 407.
Lewis, R. (1973). Personal effect together with development of dyads: an approach that is interactionist mate selection. Sociometry, 34, 409–418.
Madek, C. A. (2005). Killing dishonor: Effective eradication of honor killing. Suffolk Transnational Law Review, 29, 53.
Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: helpful tips to create and implementation. London: Wiley.
Moore, R. M. (2000). An exploratory research of interracial dating on a college campus that is small. Sociological Viewpoints, 16, 46–64.
Parks, M. R., & Adelman, M. B. (1983). Correspondence systems additionally the growth of intimate relationships: An expansion of doubt decrease concept. Human Correspondence Analysis, 10, 55–79.
Parks, M. R., & Adelman, M. B. (1983). Correspondence sites together with growth of intimate relationships: An expansion of doubt reduction concept. Human Communication Analysis, 10(1), 55–79.
Reich, W. A., Ramos, J. M., & Jaipal, R. (2000). Cultural identification and interethnic dating in Portuguese adults. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 153–161.
Sprecher, S. (1988). Investment model, equity, and social help determinants of relationship dedication. Personal Psychology Quarterly, 51, 318–328.
Sprecher, S. (2011). The impact of social networking sites on intimate relationships: Through the lens regarding the social networking. Personal Relationships, 18(4), 630–644.
Telles, E. E., & Sue, C. A. (2009). Race combination: Boundary crossing in relative viewpoint. Sociology, 35(1), 129.
Weiss, R. S. (1994). Learning from strangers: The art and ways of qualitative meeting studies. Ny: The Free Press.
Yahya, S., Bekerman, Z., Sagy, S., & Boag, S. (2012). Whenever training fulfills conflict: Palestinian and Jewish–Israeli parental attitudes towards comfort advertising training. Journal of Peace Education, 9, 297–320.
Yahya S., & Boag S. (under review-a). Facets affecting attitudes towards cross-cultural and interfaith relationship and wedding. Marriage and Family Review.
Yahya S., & Boag S. (under review-b). “Sadly, only a few love affairs are supposed to be…” Attitudes towards interfaith and cross-cultural relationship and marriages in a conflict-ridden area. Center East Journal.